RGAA / accessibility
A pragmatic path to RGAA/WCAG compliance: a prioritised action plan by effort/impact, a conformance score, and a day-rate estimate.
Our commitment in practice: explore our showcase site dedicated to accessibility, designed and audited with this very method. rgaa.betcfullsix.app
Accessibility is not a checkbox after delivery: it is a managed workstream with a starting score, a client target, and a costed path to get there. Our method is built on an action plan grouped by effort/impact, not an unordered list of non-conformant criteria. It applies equally to an initial audit and to a remediation workstream on a site already in production, with the same deliverables: score, plan, costing, re-audit.
Prioritised action plan
Three levels: P1 quick wins (low effort, high impact, often a single cross-cutting change), P2 structural fixes (shared components - one fix corrects multiple pages), P3 complementary fixes (needed to reach 100%). Each priority comes with a criteria sub-total and an estimated score, recalculated after every delivered batch.
Day-rate estimate
Each defect is estimated individually (very low / low / medium / high), then converted into person-days broken down by profile: Front, Back, Content. The CIO and the client know exactly what each phase costs before signing off, and can decide to scope only P1+P2 if budget is constrained.
Measurable conformance
The RGAA (or WCAG) conformance score is calculated from the audit and updated after each remediation batch. The 75% intermediate target is often reachable with P1+P2 alone, delivering immediate ROI on the remediation budget before committing to the longer editorial fixes.